The judge confirms the prosecution of Ayuso's boyfriend after seeing "clear signs" of fraud.

The judge of Madrid's 19th Court of Instruction has rejected the appeal filed against his prosecution by Alberto González Amador, partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, president of the Community of Madrid, finding "clear evidence" that he used false invoices to allegedly defraud the Treasury of 350,951 euros.

In a ruling, to which EFE has had access and against which an appeal can be filed before the Madrid Court, the judge confirmed her decision to propose that this businessman be tried for alleged crimes of tax fraud and document falsification, for which the Prosecutor's Office is requesting a 3-year and 9-month prison sentence .

In her ruling, the judge considers that the evidence against González Amador is based on reports from the Tax Agency and a series of documents that "demonstrate the extensive and detailed investigation carried out by impartial experts."

From all of this, "it is clear that the objective and subjective elements of the criminal offenses are present, as there is clear evidence that fictitious expenses were deducted under false invoices, since the transactions referred to in the invoiced items did not occur," the judge emphasizes.

In her ruling, the judge flatly rejects all of Díaz Ayuso's boyfriend's arguments regarding the Supreme Court 's investigation into the State Attorney General for allegedly revealing secrets related to his tax fraud case. All of this, the judge makes clear, is outside her jurisdiction.

In this main part of the case, González Amador is being prosecuted along with four other businessmen for allegedly defrauding 350,951 euros between 2020 and 2021 , and using an alleged network of false invoices to do so.

González Amador continues to be investigated in a separate case for alleged corruption in business dealings with Quirón Prevención , in which the accusations brought by Más Madrid and the PSOE suspect that he paid the wife of a director of this company - who they have asked to be charged - a hidden commission of 499,836 euros .

The judge also considers the proceedings requested by González Amador's lawyers "unnecessary," "given the evidence of the appellant's involvement in the alleged crimes," and reminds him that he may propose them at trial.

In another ruling, the judge denied the appeal filed by Alberto González Amador against her refusal to carry out various procedures , considering them useless in the investigation phase.

The judge affirms that no defenselessness has been caused by the denial of these procedures , and emphasizes that the reports of the Treasury inspectors, ratified in court and in the documentary evidence, have been taken into account, with "almost 1,500 elements that are included in the administrative file and that were taken into account in its preparation."

Regarding the argument put forward by González Amador's defense that his rights were violated because he was not allowed to testify in the proceedings, the judge recalled that he and the rest of the suspects exercised their right not to testify on February 24 , in compliance with the law, without subsequently requesting it again.